Ask The Question


thehappysorceress:

xdivinechaosx:

Catwoman, Batman & Poison Ivy, Huntress & Question, and last but certainly not least- Batgirl. 
Pitt Pen, Micron Pen, Copics. 
I work at Heroes & Villains Comics in Pleasanton, CA and these are the xmas presents I gave to my Bosses and coworkers. :) 

Helena & Vic doing the tango. This is…perfect.

thehappysorceress:

xdivinechaosx:

Catwoman, Batman & Poison Ivy, Huntress & Question, and last but certainly not least- Batgirl. 

Pitt Pen, Micron Pen, Copics. 

I work at Heroes & Villains Comics in Pleasanton, CA and these are the xmas presents I gave to my Bosses and coworkers. :) 

Helena & Vic doing the tango. This is…perfect.

» on January 30, 2012 | 14 notes | #Catwoman #Selina Kyle #Batman #Bruce Wayne #Poison Ivy #Pamela Isley #The Question #Vic Sage #Huntress #HELENA BERTINELLI #Batgirl #Barbara Gordon
noahbodie:

Vic Sage by Shelton Bryant

noahbodie:

Vic Sage by Shelton Bryant

(via thehappysorceress)

» on January 30, 2012 | 32 notes | #The Question #Vic Sage #Fedoras
ayries:

fyeahlilbitoeverything:

comicbooksawesome:

So I was thinking about how awesome a Question book with both Charlie and Renee would be.
And then I though, Helena would have to be in that book of course.
And then I thought… well, whatever you think I’m implying here… I totally am.
(She’s Got Questions, by me!)

I WANT THIS. 

y e s

ayries:

fyeahlilbitoeverything:

comicbooksawesome:

So I was thinking about how awesome a Question book with both Charlie and Renee would be.

And then I though, Helena would have to be in that book of course.

And then I thought… well, whatever you think I’m implying here… I totally am.

(She’s Got Questions, by me!)

I WANT THIS. 

y e s

(via notateenanymore)

» on January 29, 2012 | 252 notes

(Source: atheistsblog, via unfriendlyatheist)

» on January 29, 2012 | 201 notes | #god #religion #meme #pope
myvioletnature:

by SwanShadow
» on January 29, 2012 | 12 notes | #The Question #Starfire
comicbooksawesome:

I want a Question Inc. instead of Batman Inc.
Renee and Charlie forever!

comicbooksawesome:

I want a Question Inc. instead of Batman Inc.

Renee and Charlie forever!

(Source: pa-tang)

» on January 29, 2012 | 28 notes | #the question #vic sage
eximago:

howimetyourpadre:

msnbc:

NYT: 

CRANSTON, R.I. — She is 16, the daughter of a firefighter and a nurse, a self-proclaimed nerd who loves Harry Potter and Facebook. But Jessica Ahlquist is also an outspoken atheist who has incensed this heavily Roman Catholic city with a successful lawsuit to get a prayer removed from the wall of her high school auditorium, where it has hung for 49 years.

Image: Gretchen Ertl / The New York Times

People like her annoy the shit out of me. They weren’t forcing her to pray, she didn’t even have to acknowlege it was there but she goes and gets her panties up her ass and ruins a school tradition and takes away something that the people it was directed to found comfort and solace in. Same with the people who want to take “in god we trust” off the money, leave it alone, no ones forcing you to look at it. Leave it alone, I am so sick of hearing about stupid lawsuits like this. 

Heavy sigh…
As Jessica has stated, anyone who goes to that school and has to see that prayer everyday and isn’t a Christian gets to see that her school is a Christian one. The administration are Christians. Her fellow students are Christians. They get to see the prayer and be reminded constantly that they’re not the same as the rest of the school and that they’re ideas, beliefs, and passions aren’t welcome there— they’re not welcome there. It is her school too. A public school. That is, a school that’s funded by the government. By tax payers. The school broke the law when it put it up 49 years ago, and the “tradition” should never have started. It’s unconstitutional to have the prayer up which is exactly why she won the case.
Public schools are not the places for religious ritual in any form. If those kids who are heartbroken to see a prayer go, then they can go to a religious private school that doesn’t use tax payer dollars and have all the prayer they want.

eximago:

howimetyourpadre:

msnbc:

NYT: 

CRANSTON, R.I.She is 16, the daughter of a firefighter and a nurse, a self-proclaimed nerd who loves Harry Potter and Facebook. But Jessica Ahlquist is also an outspoken atheist who has incensed this heavily Roman Catholic city with a successful lawsuit to get a prayer removed from the wall of her high school auditorium, where it has hung for 49 years.

Image: Gretchen Ertl / The New York Times

People like her annoy the shit out of me. They weren’t forcing her to pray, she didn’t even have to acknowlege it was there but she goes and gets her panties up her ass and ruins a school tradition and takes away something that the people it was directed to found comfort and solace in. Same with the people who want to take “in god we trust” off the money, leave it alone, no ones forcing you to look at it. Leave it alone, I am so sick of hearing about stupid lawsuits like this. 

Heavy sigh…

As Jessica has stated, anyone who goes to that school and has to see that prayer everyday and isn’t a Christian gets to see that her school is a Christian one. The administration are Christians. Her fellow students are Christians. They get to see the prayer and be reminded constantly that they’re not the same as the rest of the school and that they’re ideas, beliefs, and passions aren’t welcome there— they’re not welcome there. It is her school too. A public school. That is, a school that’s funded by the government. By tax payers. The school broke the law when it put it up 49 years ago, and the “tradition” should never have started. It’s unconstitutional to have the prayer up which is exactly why she won the case.

Public schools are not the places for religious ritual in any form. If those kids who are heartbroken to see a prayer go, then they can go to a religious private school that doesn’t use tax payer dollars and have all the prayer they want.

(via unfriendlyatheist)

» on January 29, 2012 | 383 notes | #ahlquist #catholic #christian #atheist #atheism #rhode island #agnostic #agnosticism #religious freedom #religion #freedom #liberty #rights #oppression
» on January 26, 2012 | 100 notes
reasonablysunny:

waffleguppies:

bessonnitsa:

panadonia:

This sign pisses me off. Just because I can live without religion I’m gonna end up like Stalin? Wow…just wow
My question is, when will they have a billboard up with all the people who have done evil in the name of God? 
Btw, I’m not claiming to be atheist, nor am I claiming to be a Christian.  

So by this logic, I’m going to end up like Stalin, or even worse, Hitler? Yeah, sorry Alabama, not gonna scare me into religion.

Stalin imagined a world with no religion.Stalin caused the deaths of millions of people.Therefore all atheists are mass-murderers.
This is a brilliant example of affirming the consequent, a piece of fallacy employed worldwide with people who replaced their brains with cream cheese shortly before joining the advertisement industry. It’s a great tactic because it creates ominous and dramatic statements that worry people who aren’t that used to critical thinking, while proving to everyone who is that you shouldn’t have been let loose with a crayon, let alone a sixty-foot billboard.

It’s an utter fallacy to say that the actions of one atheist prove atheism is evil. It’s also an utter fallacy to say that the actions of one religious person prove religion is evil. Religious people and atheists make these sorts of statements, sell books predicating this sort of argument, and it’s udder twaddle.
It particularly bothers me - and I am a Christian, I should mention - when Christians say these sorts of things, as if a world filled with Christians would automatically be a functioning utopia. But of course that’s utter twaddle, too. For one thing, there are entire books of the Bible, written within the first hundred years of the church’s existence, written about (among other things) the need to resolve disputes among believers, not just about theological issues - we’re talking lawsuits and affairs, here. And in the gospels, the disciples were still bickering like schoolgirls while Jesus was around, while he was standing, like, ten feet away.
The whole experience of my life indicates that the problem with any community, no matter what the ideas it was founded on, boils down to people. People are just people. And even though I believe that God can and does change people, I don’t know anybody He’s ever made perfect, and that includes Christian authors.
As my friend Jon to me once, when I was complaining about church, “Of course Christians are what’s wrong with the church! Who did you think it was going to be, Christ?”

It is indeed not necessarily right to say that the actions of one religious person prove religion is evil. But to prove that a person did evil things because of religion is an entirely different matter. 
Stalin did evil things not because he was an atheist.
We can’t say the same for Religion and the Crusades, though. Or 9/11. Or most hate crimes against the LGBTQ community, etc. 

reasonablysunny:

waffleguppies:

bessonnitsa:

panadonia:

This sign pisses me off. Just because I can live without religion I’m gonna end up like Stalin? Wow…just wow

My question is, when will they have a billboard up with all the people who have done evil in the name of God? 

Btw, I’m not claiming to be atheist, nor am I claiming to be a Christian.  

So by this logic, I’m going to end up like Stalin, or even worse, Hitler? Yeah, sorry Alabama, not gonna scare me into religion.

Stalin imagined a world with no religion.
Stalin caused the deaths of millions of people.
Therefore all atheists are mass-murderers.

This is a brilliant example of affirming the consequent, a piece of fallacy employed worldwide with people who replaced their brains with cream cheese shortly before joining the advertisement industry. It’s a great tactic because it creates ominous and dramatic statements that worry people who aren’t that used to critical thinking, while proving to everyone who is that you shouldn’t have been let loose with a crayon, let alone a sixty-foot billboard.

It’s an utter fallacy to say that the actions of one atheist prove atheism is evil. It’s also an utter fallacy to say that the actions of one religious person prove religion is evil. Religious people and atheists make these sorts of statements, sell books predicating this sort of argument, and it’s udder twaddle.

It particularly bothers me - and I am a Christian, I should mention - when Christians say these sorts of things, as if a world filled with Christians would automatically be a functioning utopia. But of course that’s utter twaddle, too. For one thing, there are entire books of the Bible, written within the first hundred years of the church’s existence, written about (among other things) the need to resolve disputes among believers, not just about theological issues - we’re talking lawsuits and affairs, here. And in the gospels, the disciples were still bickering like schoolgirls while Jesus was around, while he was standing, like, ten feet away.

The whole experience of my life indicates that the problem with any community, no matter what the ideas it was founded on, boils down to people. People are just people. And even though I believe that God can and does change people, I don’t know anybody He’s ever made perfect, and that includes Christian authors.

As my friend Jon to me once, when I was complaining about church, “Of course Christians are what’s wrong with the church! Who did you think it was going to be, Christ?”

It is indeed not necessarily right to say that the actions of one religious person prove religion is evil. But to prove that a person did evil things because of religion is an entirely different matter. 

Stalin did evil things not because he was an atheist.

We can’t say the same for Religion and the Crusades, though. Or 9/11. Or most hate crimes against the LGBTQ community, etc. 

» on January 24, 2012 | 39 notes | #religion #jesus #faith
thehappysorceress:

The Question by Enymy

thehappysorceress:

The Question by Enymy

» on January 04, 2012 | 15 notes | #The Question #Vic Sage #Fedoras #DC #comics #still missed
discowing:

I mean, look.

discowing:

I mean, look.

» on December 31, 2011 | 39 notes | #renee montoya #barbara gordon #helena bertinelli
discowing:

[Detective 862]

discowing:

[Detective 862]

» on December 31, 2011 | 52 notes | #renee montoya #question #helena bertinelli #huntress
discowing:

[Detective 863]

discowing:

[Detective 863]

» on December 31, 2011 | 65 notes | #huntress #question #renee montoya #helena bertinelli

discowing:

Commissioner Gordon’s daughter used to pop by once in a while to pick up her dad for lunch, and—it could just have been Renee’s imagination, but she’s willing to bet it wasn’t—she’d always glance at Renee for just a second too long while waiting for him. A sassy redhead with sharp eyes and a mouth that you’re somehow always expecting to curl into a smirk, and Renee kinda used to have a little crush. But it would have been awkward to do anything, so nothing ever happened. Even so, Renee sometimes wondered what could have been. Maybe the boss would have been called out minutes before she’d arrive to pick him up, and Renee would stroll over and say something like, Stood you out?, and she’d finally give her that smirk and say, You hungry?, so they’d go to that place with the spicy chicken salad and arrange the second date sometime between the third refill of their drinks and the check arriving. She’s not Renee’s boss’ daughter anymore, but… bygones are bygones, and Renee isn’t who she used to be.

Suddenly fanfic, whoops.

[Detective 862]

» on December 31, 2011 | 86 notes | #renee montoya #helena bertinelli #barbara gordon
stripperloki:

bestofcosplay:

The Question cosplayed by Aaronwahl

O-oh! *touches screen* Oooohhhh
» on December 31, 2011 | 42 notes | #cosplay #superhero

Next »

About

portrait Vic Sage? Renee Montoya? Who am I really? The question is: Who are you?